I personally read it, and I didn't like what I saw. I mean, if you have a problem like this one, please, read something about graph theory.
If you have an acyclic graph things are much simpler, I'll explain how to do this with an example:
Let's say you have the following graph (It also works with undirected graphs):
The length of the longest (possible) path in an acyclic graph is equal to the number of vertices minus 1 (in this case 3) . The adjacency matrix gives us a lot of information. If you multiple this matrix twice, you get:
This new matrix shows the number of paths of length 2 between two vertices, for example, the number of paths of length 2 between v1 and v3 is 1. So if you want to get the number of possible paths you only need to do:
It's not my intention to say that this is the best solution, but I would like to point out that there are other possibilities than algorithms taken from a forum :-).
Then we can talk about graphs with cycles, but I should get back to work!
Cheers!
No comments:
Post a Comment